Monday, May 28, 2012
Impeachment, ABAMA COULD BE IMEACHED OVER ANWAR AL-AWLAKI. Ron Paul, ACLU Condemn Targeted Killing, please see attached video too.
Impeachment Ron Paul, ACLU Condemn Targeted Killing
Obama Could Be Impeached Over Anwar Al-Awlaki Killing
Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) suggested Monday while speaking at the University of New Hampshire that President Barack Obama could be impeached for the killing of U.S.-born al Qaeda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki in a drone strike in Yemen. Paul said an "impeachment process would be possible," according to The Hill. He added, "You could do more investigating into this. I put responsibility on the president. This is obviously a major step in the wrong direction." The libertarian-leaning presidential candidate said Friday that the killing amounted to an "assassination." He said America's leaders must think hard about "assassinating American citizens without charges."
Despite his libertarian views, which sometimes put him at odds with the GOP, Paul has had much success with his "money bomb" fundraising and has substantial organization in early states.
Paul has already said that Obama's decision to authorize military action in Libya without congressional approval was an "impeachable offense." But Paul said Monday that calling for the president's impeachment was typical for him: "I just said almost every president I've known I'd probably have to vote for impeachment, because there's very little respect for the Constitution -- and certainly there's no respect for the Constitution for assassinating American citizens." Huffington Post
IF YOU LOVE AMERICA, THEN ALL SHOULD APPLY YES AS TAKING THIS SOVERIGNT SURVEY!
1. Do you believe in the United States Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, and the Second Amendment are the Supreme Law of the Land?
2. Do you believe that any attempt by the United Nations to Subvert or Supersede your Constitutional Rights must be opposed?
3. Do you oppose the International licensing requirements, International gun registry database and International ban on all private sales that will be included in the UN's Small Arms Treaty?
4. Will you vote Against any Senator who votes for ratification of the UN's Small Arms Treaty?
| NAME: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | ||||
| E-MAIL ADDRESS: FREEDOM FOR AMERICANS | ||||
| ZIP CODE: FOR ALL WHO LIVE IN AMERICA | ||||
| IF YOU AGREE THEN SIGN HERE: Michelle Christensen | ||||
| IF YOU DON'T AGREE THEN SIGN HERE:_______________________ | ||||
Sunday, May 27, 2012
CONSTITUTIONAL LAWYER HAS READ THE ENTIRE BILL
Sent: Thu, May 24, 2012
Wait until you read this... A retired Constitutional lawyer has read the entire proposed healthcare bill. Read his conclusions and pass this on as you wish.
|
The Truth About the Health Care Bills - Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney Well,
I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill
3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with
particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I
was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being
discussed might be
unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than
what I had heard or expected. To
begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its
implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media
are
saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care,
particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are
involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion
services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of
the medical profession. The
Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of
business, and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions
about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal
bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals.
Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of
necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.
However,
as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I
have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of
providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient
cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of
government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated, If this
law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of
the United States will effectively have been destroyed.
The
first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power
between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S.
Government. That Congress will be transferring to the Obama
Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives
of the American people, and the businesses they own. The
irony is that the Congress doesn't have any authority to legislate in
most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of
the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of
Congress to regulate health care. This
legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama
administration, of all of your personal healthcare direct violation of
the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution
information, your personal financial information, and the information of
your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a protecting
against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about
the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion
regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide...If
you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private
insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices
Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you.
It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid
application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment. However,
that doesn't work because since there is nothing in the law that allows
you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely
depriving someone of property without the due process of law. So,
there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so
much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively
nullified by this law It doesn't stop there though. The
9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of
certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others
retained by the people;The
10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by
the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to
the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this
piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are
going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were
theirs to control. I
could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get
the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and
limiting rights... Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members
of both houses of Congress to "be bound by oath or affirmation to
support the Constitution." If I was a member of Congress I would not be
able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I
was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it
anyway, I would hope the
American people would hold me accountable.
For
those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult
the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see
exactly what we are about to have taken from us.
Michael Connelly
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton , Texas
[Mickey Chilton]
AFTER HAVING READ THIS, PLEASE FORWARD....
If you don't care about our constitution, or your rights under it, just do nothing.
WE MUST HOLD CONGRESS ACCOUNTABLE BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.
|
Saturday, May 26, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)